A Shanghai-based company who owns the trademark of โSmall Yellow Car (ๅฐ้ป่ฝฆ)โ filed the lawsuit against ofo, the trademark owner of โofo Small Yellow Car (ofoๅฐ้ป่ฝฆ)โ, for infringement of their registered trademark and asked for a compensation of RMB 3 million (about $452,000), Chinese media Beijing News is reporting.
As ่ฝฆ (chฤ) can mean โcarโ or vehicle in Chinese, ofo simply referred to its bikes as โofo sharing bicycles (ofoๅ ฑไบซๅ่ฝฆ)โ and โsmall yellow car (ๅฐ้ป่ฝฆ)โ. And in the court, Ofo said that the company first used the trademark โsmall yellow carโ.
Ofo claims that the plaintiff registered the trademark with malicious intent. Yesterday afternoon, Beijingโs Haidian Court heard the case in court. After four hours in court, both parties expressed their willingness to accept mediation.
On April 3rd, 2014, ofoโs co-founders registered the company as Small Yellow Bike (Beijing) Data Services Co., Ltd. (ๅฐ้ป่ฝฆ๏ผๅไบฌ๏ผๆฐๆฎๆๅกๆ้ๅ ฌๅธ), whose business scope includes technology development, data processing, and bicycle rental. On August 6th, 2015, they registered the company as Beijing Baike Technology Co., Ltd (ๅไบฌๆๅ ๆดๅ ็งๆๆ้ๅ ฌๅธ).
Ofo noted that they had launched its ofo bikes in the market and used โofoโ and โSmall yellow carโ before the plaintiffโs application for registration of โsmall yellow carโ on July 29, 2015. Ofo also said that a lot of local media also reported ofo bikes stories and referred to ofo bikes as โsmall yellow carโ or โofo shared bike.โ
โThe plaintiff did not really use the trademark โSmall Yellow Carโ for a long time, but instead made a profit through litigation,โ Ofo said during the court hearing. โThe plaintiff, starting from October 30th in 2013, has also applied for registration of several other well-known trademarks, but the registrations so far are not in real commercial use.โ
Trademark war can be frequently seen in China between China-based companies but also international brands and Chinese local companies. Last year, Apple has lost a trademark fight in China, and the Beijing court allowed a Chinese company to use the iPhone mark for its leather goods.
