More than ever before, technology such as livestreaming offers high-school students across China, including those considered economically or geographically disadvantaged, the chance to learn from the best minds in the world.

Yet, if reaction to an article that showcased one use case is anything to go by, equal access to education remains a hot button among many Chinese people.

On Dec. 14, state-owned China Youth Daily, published an article featuring Chengdu No. 7 High School, a prominent school in Chengdu, the capital of the southwestern Chinese province of Sichuan.

The article described how the school livestreams some of its classes to schools in rural, less developed parts of the province. Such a facility helps many disadvantaged students, who would otherwise be denied access to highly qualified teachers and learning materials, to score well on the national college entrance examination, or gaokao. 

This allowed them to secure a coveted place at some of the nationโ€™s leading schools, including Peking University and Tsinghua University. According to the report, more than 70,000 students across 248 schools nationwide are benefiting from the program.

The story clearly struck a chord, prompting many to take to social media to praise the power of technology, while spurring others to criticize the story for not fully reflecting the realities of Chinaโ€™s education system.

One Chinese netizen who posted to microblogging platform Weibo under the name Mia described educational livestreaming as โ€œthe biggest gift tech has broughtโ€ to the world. โ€œIโ€™m so touched, [given that] people pour so much cash into internet celebritiesโ€™ live streams,โ€ Mia added.

โ€œSharing knowledge is better than sharing anything else,โ€ another netizen called Meng Qiqi wrote also on Weibo. โ€œAll people have the right to education, which is of huge virtue.โ€

Soon as more education commentators entered the discussion, a raft of critical voices emerged, picking apart the story and questioning the real value of remote learning.

For one, it was pointed out that, in the case of No. 7 High Schoolโ€™s courses, not everybody benefits equally. For example, it transpired that not all students are eligible to participate in the livestreamed classesโ€”only selected top students at certain schools in rural areas are granted access.

Neither are the courses freeโ€”schools must bear the costs of communications equipment fees, maintenance fees, and tuition fees. One estimate puts the price of communications satellite equipment at around RMB 200,000 (or just under $29,000)โ€”a significant amount for less-developed rural communities.

An article in Shanghai-based media outlet The Paper raised several other concerns, including whether teachers in rural schools would be rendered mere โ€œteaching assistantsโ€ to the teachers No. 7 High School.

A common theme running through several commentaries was that itโ€™s the students who are responsible for their advancement in life and not technology.

โ€œWe shouldnโ€™t exaggerate online learningโ€™s roles in pushing forward equal access to education,โ€ one education expert told Chinese media outlet Caijing. โ€œAnd we canโ€™t have the illusion that installing a screen will deliver education experiences city students enjoy to those in rural areas,โ€ the expert said, adding that improving teaching quality at the local level was key.

Still others consider livestreaming of classes preferable to doing nothing, describing it as a step toward bringing equal access to education.

Chinaโ€™s education system is often criticized for its examination-focused nature that many say destroys curiosity and creativity. Still, others see the gaokao as a vital means to change the fate of students, especially those who are not from wealthy backgrounds and who may not be able to afford to study overseas.

In 2018, around 9.8 million students applied to take the gaokao, which takes place in June. Each student has only one chance to sit the exam each year. Those not satisfied with their performance must wait another year before they can retake the test.

Xiong Xuanang, a student who ranked top in the 2017 national college entrance examination among Beijing students, tackled the issue of privilege in a recent interview with Chinese media.

โ€œItโ€™s getting harder and harder for students in rural areas to get into good universities,โ€ Xiong said. โ€œStudents like meโ€”born into a middle-class family where both of my parents are intellectuals, in this big city of Beijingโ€” enjoy privileged education resources that are not available to those in other cities or rural areas.โ€

โ€œKnowledge will not always change your fate,โ€ said Xiong. โ€œBut without knowledge you surely canโ€™t change your fate.โ€

Runhua Zhao is a technology reporter based in Beijing. Connect with her via email: runhuazhao@ovau.ip-ddns.com

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.